Posted On: October 30, 2009

Veterans Hospital Paves the Way for Computerized Records

In a post from earlier this year, our attorneys at Lebowitz & Mzhen, LLC discussed how computerized health records would help Maryland pharmacists and doctors to eliminate Maryland medication mistakes.

According to a recent article in the Wall Street Journal, on how to digitize the health-care industry, Veterans hospitals have proven to have paved the way——showing doctors and pharmacists important lessons on how to effectively make the digital transformation.

The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs digitized their records years ago, with great results. Independent studies show that the VA outperformed the private sector and Medicare on preventative services and chronic care. VA officials have claimed that the digital technology has helped cut down on patient hospitalizations and has helped patients live longer.

The VA’s digital records system has been a blessing to patients, allowing doctors and nurses at more than 1,400 facilities to share the medical history of the patients—avoiding the unnecessary repetition of costly tests. As well as storing patient data, the system gives screening warnings and keeps an eye on patient levels, like blood pressure and weight—all safeguards for improved quality care.

In a digitized record for a 59-year old Maryland patient at the VA medical center, all of his health problems were listed, like diabetes and hypertension, as well as all of his data since he has been a patient at the center. The screen showed a list of all current medications, including insulin, the drug Furosemide for heart failure, and Oxycodone, the pain medication. The patient’s doctor can reorder a drug through the system, sent directly to the pharmacy—eliminating medication mistakes and pharmacy misfills. If the doctor orders a new prescription that conflicts with a drug the patient is already taking, there is a warning in the system.

Continue reading " Veterans Hospital Paves the Way for Computerized Records " »

Posted On: October 26, 2009

Medication Error Injury Prevention—Study Recommends Knowing Your Pharmacist

A recent American Pharmacists Association (APhA) survey, that our Maryland Pharmacy Error Injury Attorneys have been following, revealed that 1.5 million people are injured by medication-related errors every year. The APhA commissioned the consumer survey, led by Harris Interactive, to investigate how consumers interact with their pharmacists, and how building relationships with pharmacists can avoid patient error and reduce medication mistakes and pharmacy misfills.

The APhA always recommends that people carry an updated list of their current prescription medications, over-the-counter (OTC) drugs, herbal supplements and vitamins. The list should include the name of the medications, the dosage, as well as the conditions that the medications treat. Any patient allergies should also be included in the list.

The study reports that while a large percentage of Americans have an up-to-date list of medications, only 28% of consumers actually carry the list with them at all times—an act that could prevent personal injury and medication mistakes, by providing emergency personnel and pharmacists with lifesaving information regarding drug names, proper dosing, allergy information, and drug interactions and side effects.

According to Kristen Binaso, pharmacist and national APhA spokesperson, until electronic medical records are used as the standard in sharing patient information in the health care industry, consumers should protect themselves by keeping a current medication list with them at all times, to show the doctor and pharmacist—to avoid the risk of improper dosing, medication duplication, pharmacy misfill, and harmful drug side effects and interactions. In a recent post, our Maryland Mistake Attorneys further discussed how these electronic health records will help pharmacists and doctors to eliminate medication errors.

Next to doctors, pharmacists are the second most trusted health care providers and trained medication experts, yet the survey found that 77% of consumers do not know their pharmacists names, and only 40% of consumers have asked their pharmacists valuable questions about their medication needs.

Continue reading " Medication Error Injury Prevention—Study Recommends Knowing Your Pharmacist " »

Posted On: October 23, 2009

Cardiac Medication Dosing Errors Reported Most Commonly With Infants

As Maryland Medication Mistake Attorneys, we have been following a recent article from Cardiology Today, revealing that cardiac medication mistakes are reported most commonly with infants—in community hospitals, university hospitals, and pharmacies.

The results of a study showed that diuretics and antihypertensive agents are the most commonly reported drugs that are improperly dosed with infants—frequently prescribed by doctors for pediatric patients with heart disease. According to the article, these drugs have the potential for more widespread use because of neonatal care advances, and the increasing incidence of metabolic syndrome and childhood obesity.

Diuretics and antihypertensive agents are considered by many to be safe, because of their frequent use by doctors, but according to the research, it would be much more beneficial for the physicians, clinicians and pharmacists to have accurate information on the assessments of harm rates, and the groups of infant patients who are at particular risk—to prevent serious medical mistake errors and injury with children.

The most harmful error reports came from reported dosing error of the heart condition drugs: nesiritide, calcium channel blockers, milrinone, digozin, and antiarrhythmic agents.

According to the results from voluntary CV medication error reports that were submitted to a medication error database from the years 2003 and 2004, 50% of the total errors reported occurred in children younger than 1 year of age, and 90% of the error reports occurred in infants younger than 6 months of age.

In the 1,424 causes reported, the most frequent causes of medication error or pharmacy misfills were:

• Human error
• Improper dosing
• Missed or double doses
• Misunderstanding of drug orders
• Mathematical errors which include dilutional errors

Continue reading " Cardiac Medication Dosing Errors Reported Most Commonly With Infants " »

Posted On: October 9, 2009

ISMP Medication Error Cases and Prevention Checklist

In a prior post from this week concerning pharmacy error injury, our Maryland Medication Error Attorneys at Lebowitz & Mzhen, LLC discussed a recent study published by the Institute of Medication Practices (ISMP), and the ongoing problem with drug naming standards in extended release medications.

In this study, the ISMP revealed a series of cases reported to the institute, in which drug name suffix medication mistakes have frequently occurred. This study showed specific case examples in order to establish clearer naming conventions in the industry, and improve comprehensive pharmacist and patient awareness—to prevent pharmacy error injury and misfills in the future.

The ISMP study reported these specific medication mistake cases:

• Physicians often prescribe extended release products without the correct suffix, or with a suffix that does not exist for that particular product.

• In an analysis of 402 prescribing errors published by Medscape Pharmacists, the most common type of error in the study (280 cases, 69.7%) was failure to specify the controlled release formulation.

• The ISMP received reports of cases in which pharmacists dispensed Metadate ER instead of Metadate CD—two different extended release forms of methylphenidate-UCB, a stimulant medicine commonly used to treat ADHD. In one case, a prescription for Metadate CD 20 mg was misfiled at a pharmacy, where the staff dispensed Metadate ER 20 mg.

• Some products have multiple suffixes for different formulations of the same drug. Diltiazem products for example (calcium channel blockers) are used to slow the heart rate and normalize the heart rhythm in hypertension and arrhythmia. The many suffixes for Diltiazem include SR, CD, XR, XT, and LA.

• Electronic prescribing can also lead to medication errors on behalf of the prescriber. In one case, a prescriber electronically selected metroprolol tartrate instead of metoprolol succinate because of choosing incorrectly on his PDA.

According to this report, pharmacists, practitioners, and patients should take extra care when reviewing the different formulations and medication names, especially if the medication is available in more than one dosage form.

The ISMP recommends the following medication error prevention checklist:

Continue reading " ISMP Medication Error Cases and Prevention Checklist " »

Posted On: October 6, 2009

Patient Safety Alert: ISMP Reports Medication Error with Drug Name Suffixes

As Maryland Medication Error Attorneys, we have been following a recent study published by the Institute of Safe Medication Practices (ISMP), about the lack of prescription drug naming standards in extended release medications that lead to pharmacy error injury.

According to the study, although extended release drug formulations provide multiple benefits for many patients, the titles used for many medications are often confusing, and can cause patient error when the same drug is presented with several different oral dosage forms in the suffix.

Extended release drug formulations play an important role in maintaining consistent prescription therapies, by preventing the need for patients to remember to repeat dosages—delivering a steady dose of the medication throughout a specific period of time. The difficulty with many of these medications comes in the name. According to the study, drug manufacturers add suffixes or modifiers to already well-known medication names, to keep awareness of the brand, yet differentiate between the immediate-release counterparts. For example: Wellbutrin SR is a sustained release anti-depressant, whereas Wellbutrin XL is the extended-release version. Same name, different release rate.

ISMP reported that there is currently no standardization for the many different types of extended release formulations, nor is there any standard definition describing the dosage or release characteristics of the drugs. Patients are left to discern between identical formulations with different suffixes, or even similar prescription suffixes with dissimilar formulations, creating potential for pharmacy error injury or misfills.

The ISMP has recommended to the United States Pharmacopeial Convention (USP) that naming standards be established to avoid patient confusion with the many similar formulations of the same drug, by incorporating suffixes or descriptive phrases into the drug names, or by inventing new brand names to designate different formulation properties. The FDA is also reportedly aware of the suffix problems and currently exploring new ideas to improve the naming convention.

If you or someone you know has experienced pharmacy error injury in Maryland or Washington, D.C., contact the attorneys at Lebowitz and Mzhen, LLC for a free consultation.

The Alphabet Soup of Drug Names Suffixes, ISMP Error Alert—Pharmacy Today, August 2009

Related Web Resources:

Institute for Safe Medication Practices, (ISMP)

Council Recommendations: Promoting the Safe Use of Suffixes in Prescription Drug Names, National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCC MERP)

MedWatch: The FDA Safety Information and Adverse Event Reporting Program